Thursday, February 25, 2010

Some Research....

I have been doing some research for my project on the following artists.

Edwin Zwakman: 
Zwakman works with the reality in photos by constructing landscapes 
from personal memory.  He then photogra
phs the objects as if it is a real scene.  




Thomas Demand:  
Demand creates miniature 
dioramas out of paper to mimic real life places such as the oval office, and the grottos.  Demand then photographs these photos in a way that makes it seem like the photographer was actually in that very room and that it is not just a diorama made out of paper, but an actual space.  









Naoki Honjo:  
Honjo does sort of the opposite with his work than my project.  His photos are of real life scenes but taken at such a distance that the seem like little plastic architectures and figurines.  













Courtney Beckett:  
Beckett is a photographer that takes very commercial advertisement like picture
s of food. 











Slinkachu:  
Slinkachu is a street photographer who hand makes little figurines and puts them into the real world so they are basically interacting with reality.  This is wonderful for the commentary on real versus fake in photography.







Thesis Review

Today I had my second thesis review of the quarter.  I have to be honest I was really really nervous about this one especially because of how the previous thesis meeting went.  I even brought my good luck duck with me!!!  I was happily surprised because this one thankfully went A LOT better than my last thesis review.  My new project seemed to get a much better reaction than my previous project dealing with bands.  I hung up both the cookie photo and the cheeseburger photo and was told that they are both good but they are going in two separate directions.  The cheeseburger one shows how the consumerism approach to show "fake" food as an edible item.  While the cookies show sort of a false gesture of love by someone taking the time to bake you cookies but the cookies aren't really real.  I was pretty much told that I can really go either route for the photos, the commercial advertisement route or the comforting false gesture route.  At this point I am sort of leaning more towards the advertisement commercial route because the part that really got me interested was the fact that we really do live in a society that sort of praises "fake" food.  Even more so, it is so interesting to me that the food that we see on menus, has been so manipulated to look good that what they are advertising really is "fake" food.  Anyway I am really quite excited at how well it went because like I said, I was completely nervous.  My good luck duck paid off!!!!

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

posting drama...

Ugh!!!! I tried posting my two photo show analysis' and it keeps cutting off part of the post.  Oh well at least I have a hard copy.

Photo show #2

PRESENTATION OF ART- ANALYSIS WORKSHEET

 

Chewing Color

 

 

1.              General Description of the Show

 

A.   The artists' name(s):

Marilyn Minter

 

B.    How many pieces are in the show:

There are 10 pieces in the show.

 

C.    Describe the location/context of the exhibition space:

This show is on the second floor of the Contemporary Arts Center.  There is one large room and one smaller room connected by a short hallway with work hung fairly spaced apart on white walls.

 

D.   Describe your perceptions on the content or idea behind the work:

My perception of this is that it is all about female beauty and glamour.  The colors are bright and shiny and there seems to be glitter included.  This seems to be from the other end of glamour and beauty, for example, when it goes wrong and how this beautiful person can suddenly seem gross.  This is the complete opposite end of the beautiful spectrum.

 

 

 

2.        Give Detailed Descriptions of the Following:

 

A.            The method of presentation of artwork (media of artwork, size of artwork, and

how it is presented- frames, mats, pushpins, pedestals, etc.)

This exhibit includes one video projected very large scale on a plain wall, two large-scale paintings, one smaller painting, and six large-scale photographs.  The video is projected on what I assume is cinema size, the larger paintings are 96 x 60 inches, the smaller painting is 24 x 24 inches, and the photos included the sizes 40 x 30 inches and 86 x 60 inches.  There are no frames or mattes on any of the pieces.  Only clips hold up the work.  The photos are all c-prints and the paintings are all enamel on metal.

 

B.             The nature of the exhibition space (size, shape, ceiling height, formal, informal,

etc.)

The space includes one large, dimly lit, room where the video is being shown.  There are high ceilings (about thirty feet), white walls, and a reflective concrete floor with two concrete pillars and a set of stairs going up.  There is a long bench, that is actually quite comfortable to sit and watch the film and there is soft music playing.  It is wide open in the room.  The artwork is presented in a rather informal way but in a formal setting.

 

C.             The type and nature of the lighting in the exhibition space

The larger room is dimly lit with some natural light.  The smaller room, as well as the short hallway, is much better lit.  They have rather warm toned yellowish-orange overhead spotlights. 

 

 

D.            The relationship of the art pieces to each other (physical and thematic)

Physically the photos differ from the paintings and both from the video.  However, they are all consistent in color choice.  They all involve some trace of the female body.  Thematically, they all relate to each other perfectly.  They all highlight the imperfect perception of female beauty.

 

E.             Other external factors (noise level, air currents, number of people in the space,

etc.)

The sound factors in the room include the soundtrack for the video that is playing as well as external factors such as the echoing of footsteps and voices throughout the building.   There are only two other people in the exhibit.  They are both men and seem to only be interested in the photography not the video or paintings.

 

 

 

3.              How the Presentation Method Affects the Art (use the back, if necessary)

If you feel that the method used to present the work supports and enhances its

meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

 

If you feel that the method used to present the work detracts from and weakens its

meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

           

This is an informal subject presented in a formal setting.  I feel that this method sort of works against each other in that the art all highlights this imperfect dirty being - yet it is presented in a clean art gallery setting.  The video was probably a more influential experience when it was shown in Times Square.

Photo show #1

PRESENTATION OF ART- ANALYSIS WORKSHEET

 

Starburst: Color Photography in America (1970-1980)

 

 

1.              General Description of the Show

 

A.   The artists' name(s):

Many different photographers including:

*Joel Meyerowitz

*Nan Golden

*William Eggleston

*Mitch Epstein

*Helen Levitt

 

B.    How many pieces are in the show:

Many different collections ranging from just a couple prints to twenty or so prints to literally hundreds grouped together for one collection

 

C.    Describe the location/context of the exhibition space:

This show is at the Cincinnati Art Museum.  It is set up like a maze to direct you through each collection.  Each artist has their own section in the maze with a quote from them about their color photography and a brief description of their work.  It is lit by warm overhead lighting only.  The walls are consistently white with wood flooring.  There are benches throughout the gallery to sit upon and reflect.  It’s rather warm in the gallery with sounds of footsteps, quiet voices, and jingling keys.

 

D.   Describe your perceptions on the content or idea behind the work:

I think this show is purely about the introduction of color in the world of photography from 1970 to 1980.  Each artist’s collection has their own idea behind their use of color.  Collectively they work just as a focus on color photography from 1970-1980

 

 

 

2.        Give Detailed Descriptions of the Following:

 

A.            The method of presentation of artwork (media of artwork, size of artwork, and

how it is presented- frames, mats, pushpins, pedestals, etc.)

The method of presentation is quite different depending on the photographer.  They range all the way from 2 x 2 inches to about 3 x 4 feet.  Most of the works are window matted with thick, white matte board with either a white or black frame with glass overtop.  The photographs range from different types of printing methods including: chromogenic prints, dye transfer prints, offset lithography on a magazine page, projections, cibachrome prints, Polaroid’s, inkjet prints, pigment prints, and ectacolor prints.

 

B.             The nature of the exhibition space (size, shape, ceiling height, formal, informal,

etc.)

The exhibition is formal with high ceiling and a very open space. It is lit by warm overhead lighting only.  The walls are consistently white with wood flooring.  There are benches throughout the gallery to sit upon and reflect.

 

 

C.             The type and nature of the lighting in the exhibition space

The lighting is a warm toned yellowish-orange overhead lighting

 

D.            The relationship of the art pieces to each other (physical and thematic)

Thematically related through color.  Physically each collection is separated into its own space, however they are all the traditional rectangular and square format framed and matted with a few exceptions that are the projections.

 

E.             Other external factors (noise level, air currents, number of people in the space,

etc.)

This is a warm gallery space.  There are noises of footsteps, voices, and jingling keys.  Because of the gallery set up, other people seem sparse, but you can hear them all.

 

 

3.              How the Presentation Method Affects the Art (use the back, if necessary)

If you feel that the method used to present the work supports and enhances its

meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

 

If you feel that the method used to present the work detracts from and weakens its

meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

 

The method of presentation enhances and strengthens the work.  The unity of presentation and framing works to prevent any detraction from the overall theme of color, while the slight separation of each individual collection allows the viewer to ponder about the specific intentions of the artists.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Work in Progress #2

Today was the second work in progress review.  For the first time in I would probably say my career at DAAP, I left the work in progress review with an overall good feeling as to how the review went!  I was picked to go first which I always like because my nerves are always all over the place, so this calms them down getting it over with.  I explained my two pictures and the first comment was from Lillia.  She said 'I love this so much!!! They actually make me hungry.  It's awesome!'.  Bless her!!!!!  That is exactly what I needed to hear.  I just felt like the overall response was so good!  Janie said that she really liked that I was considering the lighting as part of the composition.  The lighting from the cookies to the cheeseburger is s0 different but yet so natural to the subject.  The cheeseburger has high florescent lights like a fast food restaurant should while the cookies have a warmer feel to them, like in a home kitchen.  Brian suggested what if they all had studio lighting like a food advertisement because then it is playing on the "fakeness" on two different levels.  I really like this idea too.  I love the idea of taking highly commercial advertisement pictures of fake food!  Janie suggested that these types of things are great to play with to discover within myself what way speaks to me the most.  I am definitely looking forward to experimenting with this!  Some artists that were suggested to me are: Edwin Zwakman
Thomas Demand
Naoki Honjo
I look forward to researching these artists and more even though I hate research!
-till next time...

Oh, here are the pictures I used for the review!!














Wednesday, February 17, 2010

in the works....

cookies done!!! now it's fry time!!!
I am kind of thinking of floating frames for my final presentation but Stacey had a great point in that when you have clear surrounding your picture, you surrender yourself to whatever the background color of the wall may be. Hmmmm, I don't know how I feel about that. Maybe a shadowbox? That way I know the background color will always stay constant, but I will still have floating effect for the picture. I am also still thinking about the crochet window matte as Caitlin suggested. Right now though, the most important thing is the photos so I am sort of putting presentation on the back burner for just a little, certainly not until the day before DAAPWorks by any means, but for just a bit right now.
Tomorrow we have our second work in progress review, which actually is my first work in progress review since the thesis change. I can't say that I am not nervous for this one but then, I am always nervous. I really like what I have been doing and am excited to show it at the review tomorrow.
till then...

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Visualization Exercise #3: Framing














Today we had our third visualization exercise on framing.  I chose to do a floating frame, no frame, mounted on matte board, and a resin frame with crochet stitches going through it.  I have learned a very important lesson from this: Resin shrinks!  I think I might like to use a floating frame or shadowbox for my final pieces.  We also went around and titled each other's pieces.  Two of my favorites were "100% Angus Yarn" and "Untitled".  I feel that both of these speak to the overall message of the piece.  "100% Angus Yarn" because immediately, my eye reads "100% Angus Beef" and that is sort of the "ah ha" moment of realizing that it actually says yarn just like the same "ah ha" moment when you realize the photo is actually of a crocheted cheeseburger.  I like "Untitled" because I feel that the work is able to speak for itself and so naming each individual piece is hitting the viewer over the head with it.  It definitely gave me a lot to think about.
Till next time...

Monday, February 8, 2010

workin on some chocolate chip cookies now :)

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Wow! Sooo much better!!!

Yesterday, I had my midterm review for my Advanced Photography class. I will be honest, I was extremely scared to face the class even though it is filled with wonderful people and a wonderful instructor. After my last encounter with Ryan, I was very fearful of rejection. I had started to become excited about this new idea and definitely did not want to be pushed down to square one all over again. I worked really really hard on fixing the lighting of the penguin picture and was quite happy with it finally:
I was excited to hang the pi
cture up, but very scared at what the reaction would be. When we started class, we were told to write a question for ourselves and then write a question and post it up next to each picture of everyone in the class. I think this is both an incredibly helpful and incredibly scary exercise. When you are free to
ask what you like in an anonymous fashion you may feel unchained to protect feelings of the artist because they won't know who you are. So my thoughts immediately went to "if anyone absolutely hates this, they now have free reign to express it without me knowing who it is". Most fortunately, the questions I got were mostly "I really like this but, how in the world did you go from bands to penguins". Obviously without previously releasing to the class that my entire thesis had changed pretty much on a dime, this photo would come as a huge shock. I told them how my last thesis review went and told them that I have come to the point where just because you absolutely love something and love to take thousands and thousands of pictures of it does not mean there is enough power behind it for it to become a thesis. I used the example that I
absolutely love my cat, Mowgli Sebastian. He means the world to me and I have probably have well over 20,000 pictures of him in my iPhoto on my Mac. But I have never considered doing a thesis on him, because I know I love him, but why should anyone else be forced to or made to feel that they should also love him. I told them that from the get-go I never was planning on doing a thesis on Mowgli, and so likewise, I can absolutely love my bands and continue to take thousands and thousands of pictures of my bands but not have them be part of my thesis. I shared with them my new idea for my thesis and got their take on it. Janie asked me "What other pictures were you planning on taking? Were they all going to be penguins or other animals?" I told her the current one I am working on is a cheeseburger and then I was going to do a car maybe next. Janie immediately made the connection with a cheeseburger from McDonald's "Isn't that funny? McDonald's is not exactly real food and you are replacing the 'fake' burger with a new fake burger but one that you made". Then the suggestion was made by everyone "why not only crochet food? forget about the animals - just do different types of food making a commentary on this 'fake processed food'." This food is processed and I am processing my own "fake food" through crochet. I feel it necessary to use all caps for this: I LOVE THIS IDEA!!!!! It went from depicting a false reality on everything to a false reality on what we consider food, which I think is so much more powerful. I am very very excited for what is to come out of this project and am actually excited to work on it and talk about it now! This was one of maybe the most helpful critiques I can think of having in my entire DAAP career. I normally leave critiques feeling very angry and sad at how it went, and now, well lets just say everyone close to me is getting sick of me for making them listen to this new idea again and again- and it's only been 24 hours!!! (Sorry Emily haha). And I know that I am not supposed to really think about titles until I have all my work to make it work well, but I have thought of a title already that I LOVE!! "Is There Enough Fiber in Your Diet?". Awesome right? Anyway, till next time!

Sunday, January 31, 2010

working on...

Currently I am wrapping up the "cheeseburger" portion of my idea :)

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Visualization Exercise #2: Borders

Today we had our second visualization exercise.  I chose to bring in one of the penguin pictures I am working on.  For this one we had to make different borders on our prints.  I can say with 100% certainty that I don't like the way the large thick borders, no matter the color, look with this piece.  I noticed that a lot of people, in fact most of our class, absolutely hate borders!  I don't hate borders.  I really enjoyed the thin black line border.  I just felt like it really keeps the picture enclosed in a predetermined space.




Sunday, January 24, 2010

A bit of reading material...

Currently I just started a wonderful book Janie gave me called, "Writing Down The Bones" by: Natalie Goldberg. I am really excited about this book as it is supposed to show you how to keep on being creative and how to heighten your ability! So far it's great!

Saturday, January 23, 2010

So here's what i'm thinkin....

So after many many hours of thought of where to go from being stuck and angry, I finally thought of a new thesis that I would like and am excited to do. While I was reflecting on my past thesis review when Ryan said that I was in a way altering reality, I thought about intentionally altering reality. What I am going to do now for my thesis is take pictures of everyday things, situations, etc, and alter the reality of the photo. I wanted to play with the idea that traditionally, when viewing a photograph, the viewer is likely to assume what they are seeing is the truth and believe that to be a depiction of reality. I really want to play with that idea that this reality you are seeing can actually be an altered, untrue reality. I was brainstorming with what could be representative of a string of a false reality webbed together in a world that is depicting real life, but is in fact definitely not real life. When brainstorming with a friend of mine, who is a professional photographer, he was thinking with me and said "You knit don't you?". (As a side note, because I crochet, I felt it was important to make a correction to him that no, I do not knit, I crochet; I think this is a disease that knitters and crocheters alike possess, in that we are so proud of our needle/hook work that we feel we are against the other side of the spectrum, so knitters will always tell you they do NOT crochet they KNIT and likewise, crocheters will always tell you they do NOT knit they CROCHET.) Anyway, back to my thesis, my photographer friend that I was brainstorming with brought to my attention that crochet would be an excellent representation of a string of falsities knotted into a web of a false reality. What I am going to do is to be crocheting objects to bring into a real life situation so the viewer can see the picture and immediately know that this cannot be what really happened, or what really was there. When I told Janie about this she suggested do the crochet but also try out other avenues too, I think that is a great idea! I am actually really excited to be doing this as my thesis and I have already begun working on it and am just having a lot of fun with it!

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Visualization Exercise #1: Sizes



So today was our first visualization project.  For this one we had to have the same image printed in six different sizes.  The sizes were 2*3, 4*6, 7*9, 9*13, 11*14, and 16*20.  I went into this one thinking I would really like seeing the larger versions of my print, however I think I took the sizes too literally in that I allowed my pictures to end up skewed.  When editing the photos in photoshop, I noticed that when I changed one dimension to the prompt, the other would not match, so I unchecked the "constrain proportions" option.  Looking back, I would have rather changed the largest size but have it constrain the proportions so the photo did not turn out skewed.  I really did enjoy seeing how the mood of the picture changes when the overall size changes though.  I really like the look of the photo I used large, but since I am rethinking my thesis, I am thinking I will have to do this exercise again with whatever my new thesis is.  
Still bummed that my bands are no longer my thesis :(
Oh well, till next time....


Thursday, January 14, 2010

I don't know anymore...

Today I had my second thesis review. I wanted to go to the computer immediately afterwards to right down the experience while it was fresh in my mind, however I could not bring myself to sit down and write about it because of how frustrated it made me. I thought I would give myself some time to cool off however, twelve hours later, I am still just as pissed.

Currently, I have no idea where I am at as far as my thesis goes. I have no idea what direction I am going in and I have no idea if I am even still doing bands. I would love to do a thesis project on the bands, however, I don't think I will ever be able to satisfy the notion of a concept connected to the photos. I could make one up and just bend to the will and let someone start my concept and reply "Yes that is exactly what I was thinking of doing, you are dead on" and just allow myself to be pushed into any meaning, have things implanted in my brain. But that is not who I am. Currently I am at a bit at a loss as to what I am even doing, which is exactly where I want to be this far along in the game.

I feel mad at myself for making the edits to one of my photos because it unleashed this whole new demon of questioning reality, which is not what I was going for.

I told my thesis committee today that all I want to do at this point is just get through this program to reach my degree. I don't feel like I have some message that I need to get out. I don't regret saying this. I just feel like I am stuck in the middle of an ocean treading. Eventually your legs will cramp, and you will drown.

I was questioned by Ryan in my committee about my "voice" in the art world. I honestly don't feel like I have one. I am not some deep person and that makes me feel incorrect. I feel like I didn't have the "right" answers to Ryan's question. I don't know what the "right" answers were. After my thesis meeting, if I didn't already feel like an outsider in the "fine arts world" I certainly do now.

During my meeting I was questioned why I pursued a degree in DAAP rather than say photo journalism or e-media in CCM. As a senior in high school, all I wanted to do was go to a photography school. After much research of various schools, I found DAAP and saw nothing but great comments on their photography department. I applied to DAAP and only DAAP. My mother didn't like that I was putting all my eggs in one basket and encouraged me to apply to other schools as well. I told her if I didn't get into DAAP, then I was just not going to go to college because the only place I wanted to go was DAAP for photography. I was ecstatic the day I received my acceptance letter to my one and only choice school, DAAP. I do not by any means regret my decision to go to DAAP. DAAP truly has a wonderful photography department and I feel it has made my work one hundred times stronger in learning from their department. I HATE that question "why did you pursuit a degree in DAAP instead of photojournalism?". This question makes me feel unworthy of the wonderful resources DAAP has to offer. I just feel like everything I do in DAAP is "wrong" because it's conceptual value has no intention on changing the world.

Minutes after my thesis review ended, I had my first work in progress review for this quarter of advanced photography. (I know double whammy!) Janie very kindly explained to my group what had just happened in my thesis meeting and told them I am now at a loss of where to go. I agreed with her and the floor was opened for any suggestions they might have. I cannot express through words the gratitude I felt and still feel for my group this afternoon for all of their encouraging support. Stacey Oliver looked horrified when I told them that I feel like I am in the wrong program and told me she thinks I need to do what makes me happy and that by no means does that say I shouldn't be able to do what I love in DAAP and that I should be here and I do belong here. It was extremely encouraging to hear this. Amanda Aton offered a similar experience that she had endured during her undergrad school. I cannot even describe how helpful it was to hear that I was not alone in feeling this way. Suddenly I wasn't so strange.

Everyone in my group mentioned that having thousands of pictures that I now am not sure what to do with is not a failure but rather a stepping stone or building foundation. Currently I am in the process of thinking of what it is I want to do and what it is I want to say. I am sort of playing with the idea of the whole "reality" issue and pondering what it would be like to photograph "lies". I am still ironing out the details though.

Still frustrated, but hoping to move forward
Till next time.....

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Just Some Samples...






























































I have been experimenting with different tonal ranges for my photos. These are five examples of some of the photos.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

My Thesis

My thesis is called "Almost Famous Friends". I know that many times when we fall in love with a band we begin to worship them and see them as god-like creatures. I am privileged enough to personally know several band members and am constantly reminded that they are just normal human beings who happen to be in a wonderful position. They goof off like regular people, they have fun like regular people and they enjoy everyday things just like regular people. For my thesis I am going to try and show this notion of these "rockstars" just being normal people. I am going to be mixing pictures of them in action being their rockstar self at the concerts and then I am going to show everyday pictures of them being normal people. I hope to show both the fun and impressive behaviors to these individuals.