Thursday, February 25, 2010

Some Research....

I have been doing some research for my project on the following artists.

Edwin Zwakman: 
Zwakman works with the reality in photos by constructing landscapes 
from personal memory.  He then photogra
phs the objects as if it is a real scene.  




Thomas Demand:  
Demand creates miniature 
dioramas out of paper to mimic real life places such as the oval office, and the grottos.  Demand then photographs these photos in a way that makes it seem like the photographer was actually in that very room and that it is not just a diorama made out of paper, but an actual space.  









Naoki Honjo:  
Honjo does sort of the opposite with his work than my project.  His photos are of real life scenes but taken at such a distance that the seem like little plastic architectures and figurines.  













Courtney Beckett:  
Beckett is a photographer that takes very commercial advertisement like picture
s of food. 











Slinkachu:  
Slinkachu is a street photographer who hand makes little figurines and puts them into the real world so they are basically interacting with reality.  This is wonderful for the commentary on real versus fake in photography.







Thesis Review

Today I had my second thesis review of the quarter.  I have to be honest I was really really nervous about this one especially because of how the previous thesis meeting went.  I even brought my good luck duck with me!!!  I was happily surprised because this one thankfully went A LOT better than my last thesis review.  My new project seemed to get a much better reaction than my previous project dealing with bands.  I hung up both the cookie photo and the cheeseburger photo and was told that they are both good but they are going in two separate directions.  The cheeseburger one shows how the consumerism approach to show "fake" food as an edible item.  While the cookies show sort of a false gesture of love by someone taking the time to bake you cookies but the cookies aren't really real.  I was pretty much told that I can really go either route for the photos, the commercial advertisement route or the comforting false gesture route.  At this point I am sort of leaning more towards the advertisement commercial route because the part that really got me interested was the fact that we really do live in a society that sort of praises "fake" food.  Even more so, it is so interesting to me that the food that we see on menus, has been so manipulated to look good that what they are advertising really is "fake" food.  Anyway I am really quite excited at how well it went because like I said, I was completely nervous.  My good luck duck paid off!!!!

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

posting drama...

Ugh!!!! I tried posting my two photo show analysis' and it keeps cutting off part of the post.  Oh well at least I have a hard copy.

Photo show #2

PRESENTATION OF ART- ANALYSIS WORKSHEET

 

Chewing Color

 

 

1.              General Description of the Show

 

A.   The artists' name(s):

Marilyn Minter

 

B.    How many pieces are in the show:

There are 10 pieces in the show.

 

C.    Describe the location/context of the exhibition space:

This show is on the second floor of the Contemporary Arts Center.  There is one large room and one smaller room connected by a short hallway with work hung fairly spaced apart on white walls.

 

D.   Describe your perceptions on the content or idea behind the work:

My perception of this is that it is all about female beauty and glamour.  The colors are bright and shiny and there seems to be glitter included.  This seems to be from the other end of glamour and beauty, for example, when it goes wrong and how this beautiful person can suddenly seem gross.  This is the complete opposite end of the beautiful spectrum.

 

 

 

2.        Give Detailed Descriptions of the Following:

 

A.            The method of presentation of artwork (media of artwork, size of artwork, and

how it is presented- frames, mats, pushpins, pedestals, etc.)

This exhibit includes one video projected very large scale on a plain wall, two large-scale paintings, one smaller painting, and six large-scale photographs.  The video is projected on what I assume is cinema size, the larger paintings are 96 x 60 inches, the smaller painting is 24 x 24 inches, and the photos included the sizes 40 x 30 inches and 86 x 60 inches.  There are no frames or mattes on any of the pieces.  Only clips hold up the work.  The photos are all c-prints and the paintings are all enamel on metal.

 

B.             The nature of the exhibition space (size, shape, ceiling height, formal, informal,

etc.)

The space includes one large, dimly lit, room where the video is being shown.  There are high ceilings (about thirty feet), white walls, and a reflective concrete floor with two concrete pillars and a set of stairs going up.  There is a long bench, that is actually quite comfortable to sit and watch the film and there is soft music playing.  It is wide open in the room.  The artwork is presented in a rather informal way but in a formal setting.

 

C.             The type and nature of the lighting in the exhibition space

The larger room is dimly lit with some natural light.  The smaller room, as well as the short hallway, is much better lit.  They have rather warm toned yellowish-orange overhead spotlights. 

 

 

D.            The relationship of the art pieces to each other (physical and thematic)

Physically the photos differ from the paintings and both from the video.  However, they are all consistent in color choice.  They all involve some trace of the female body.  Thematically, they all relate to each other perfectly.  They all highlight the imperfect perception of female beauty.

 

E.             Other external factors (noise level, air currents, number of people in the space,

etc.)

The sound factors in the room include the soundtrack for the video that is playing as well as external factors such as the echoing of footsteps and voices throughout the building.   There are only two other people in the exhibit.  They are both men and seem to only be interested in the photography not the video or paintings.

 

 

 

3.              How the Presentation Method Affects the Art (use the back, if necessary)

If you feel that the method used to present the work supports and enhances its

meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

 

If you feel that the method used to present the work detracts from and weakens its

meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

           

This is an informal subject presented in a formal setting.  I feel that this method sort of works against each other in that the art all highlights this imperfect dirty being - yet it is presented in a clean art gallery setting.  The video was probably a more influential experience when it was shown in Times Square.

Photo show #1

PRESENTATION OF ART- ANALYSIS WORKSHEET

 

Starburst: Color Photography in America (1970-1980)

 

 

1.              General Description of the Show

 

A.   The artists' name(s):

Many different photographers including:

*Joel Meyerowitz

*Nan Golden

*William Eggleston

*Mitch Epstein

*Helen Levitt

 

B.    How many pieces are in the show:

Many different collections ranging from just a couple prints to twenty or so prints to literally hundreds grouped together for one collection

 

C.    Describe the location/context of the exhibition space:

This show is at the Cincinnati Art Museum.  It is set up like a maze to direct you through each collection.  Each artist has their own section in the maze with a quote from them about their color photography and a brief description of their work.  It is lit by warm overhead lighting only.  The walls are consistently white with wood flooring.  There are benches throughout the gallery to sit upon and reflect.  It’s rather warm in the gallery with sounds of footsteps, quiet voices, and jingling keys.

 

D.   Describe your perceptions on the content or idea behind the work:

I think this show is purely about the introduction of color in the world of photography from 1970 to 1980.  Each artist’s collection has their own idea behind their use of color.  Collectively they work just as a focus on color photography from 1970-1980

 

 

 

2.        Give Detailed Descriptions of the Following:

 

A.            The method of presentation of artwork (media of artwork, size of artwork, and

how it is presented- frames, mats, pushpins, pedestals, etc.)

The method of presentation is quite different depending on the photographer.  They range all the way from 2 x 2 inches to about 3 x 4 feet.  Most of the works are window matted with thick, white matte board with either a white or black frame with glass overtop.  The photographs range from different types of printing methods including: chromogenic prints, dye transfer prints, offset lithography on a magazine page, projections, cibachrome prints, Polaroid’s, inkjet prints, pigment prints, and ectacolor prints.

 

B.             The nature of the exhibition space (size, shape, ceiling height, formal, informal,

etc.)

The exhibition is formal with high ceiling and a very open space. It is lit by warm overhead lighting only.  The walls are consistently white with wood flooring.  There are benches throughout the gallery to sit upon and reflect.

 

 

C.             The type and nature of the lighting in the exhibition space

The lighting is a warm toned yellowish-orange overhead lighting

 

D.            The relationship of the art pieces to each other (physical and thematic)

Thematically related through color.  Physically each collection is separated into its own space, however they are all the traditional rectangular and square format framed and matted with a few exceptions that are the projections.

 

E.             Other external factors (noise level, air currents, number of people in the space,

etc.)

This is a warm gallery space.  There are noises of footsteps, voices, and jingling keys.  Because of the gallery set up, other people seem sparse, but you can hear them all.

 

 

3.              How the Presentation Method Affects the Art (use the back, if necessary)

If you feel that the method used to present the work supports and enhances its

meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

 

If you feel that the method used to present the work detracts from and weakens its

meaning to the viewer, clarify the criteria upon which you are basing this opinion.

 

The method of presentation enhances and strengthens the work.  The unity of presentation and framing works to prevent any detraction from the overall theme of color, while the slight separation of each individual collection allows the viewer to ponder about the specific intentions of the artists.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Work in Progress #2

Today was the second work in progress review.  For the first time in I would probably say my career at DAAP, I left the work in progress review with an overall good feeling as to how the review went!  I was picked to go first which I always like because my nerves are always all over the place, so this calms them down getting it over with.  I explained my two pictures and the first comment was from Lillia.  She said 'I love this so much!!! They actually make me hungry.  It's awesome!'.  Bless her!!!!!  That is exactly what I needed to hear.  I just felt like the overall response was so good!  Janie said that she really liked that I was considering the lighting as part of the composition.  The lighting from the cookies to the cheeseburger is s0 different but yet so natural to the subject.  The cheeseburger has high florescent lights like a fast food restaurant should while the cookies have a warmer feel to them, like in a home kitchen.  Brian suggested what if they all had studio lighting like a food advertisement because then it is playing on the "fakeness" on two different levels.  I really like this idea too.  I love the idea of taking highly commercial advertisement pictures of fake food!  Janie suggested that these types of things are great to play with to discover within myself what way speaks to me the most.  I am definitely looking forward to experimenting with this!  Some artists that were suggested to me are: Edwin Zwakman
Thomas Demand
Naoki Honjo
I look forward to researching these artists and more even though I hate research!
-till next time...

Oh, here are the pictures I used for the review!!














Wednesday, February 17, 2010

in the works....

cookies done!!! now it's fry time!!!
I am kind of thinking of floating frames for my final presentation but Stacey had a great point in that when you have clear surrounding your picture, you surrender yourself to whatever the background color of the wall may be. Hmmmm, I don't know how I feel about that. Maybe a shadowbox? That way I know the background color will always stay constant, but I will still have floating effect for the picture. I am also still thinking about the crochet window matte as Caitlin suggested. Right now though, the most important thing is the photos so I am sort of putting presentation on the back burner for just a little, certainly not until the day before DAAPWorks by any means, but for just a bit right now.
Tomorrow we have our second work in progress review, which actually is my first work in progress review since the thesis change. I can't say that I am not nervous for this one but then, I am always nervous. I really like what I have been doing and am excited to show it at the review tomorrow.
till then...